[gpga-news] NYT: Party Strains to Be Heard Now That Its Voice Isn’t Nader’s

Hugh Esco hesco at greens.org
Sat Jul 14 11:31:38 PDT 2012


Party Strains to Be Heard Now That Its Voice Isn’t Nader’s
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/13/us/politics/jill-stein-green-party-candidate-and-the-chances-of-making-a-difference.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all
By SUSAN SAULNY
Published: July 12, 2012

BOSTON — Jill Stein, presumptive nominee of the Green Party, is
probably the only candidate on the campaign trail who spends an hour a
day cooking her own organic meals — and who was, not too long ago, the
lead singer of a folksy rock band. Enlarge This Image Charlie Mahoney
for The New York Times

But the differences do not end there. When Ms. Stein is introduced on
the trail as “Jill Stein for president,” she is also very likely the
only candidate to be asked, “For president of what?”

That’s what Keith Brockenberry, a cook, wanted to know at a
meet-and-greet in Roxbury last week. After one of Ms. Stein’s
supporters clarified, “for president of the United States,” Mr.
Brockenberry seemed both taken aback and delighted.

“Get out of here!” he blurted out. “I had no idea.”

What Ms. Stein lacks in name recognition, however, she is trying to
make up for these days in high-energy organization and low-cost social
media outreach. When she officially accepts the nomination at the Green
Party’s convention this weekend in Baltimore, she will be the party’s
first candidate to have qualified for federal matching funds — a
milestone for this 11-year-old alternative party and potentially a
major boost for a campaign that does not accept corporate donations.

The Green Party of the United States expects to be on the ballot in at
least 45 states and to spend about $1 million on its campaign. At the
moment, it has secured ballot access, an organizational test in itself,
in 21 states, including the battlegrounds of Colorado, Florida,
Michigan and Ohio, where the major party candidates, President Obama
and Mitt Romney, who are raising tens of millions of dollars every
month, are locked in a tight race.

While Ms. Stein barely registers a blip in national polling, experts
point to Ralph Nader, the Green Party nominee in 2000, who was seen by
many Democrats as siphoning just enough votes from Al Gore in one
state, Florida, to tip the election to the Republican, George W. Bush.
Nationally, Mr. Nader had captured only 3 percent of the vote.

Could such a situation unfold again?

Unlike Ms. Stein, a physician on leave from her practice, Mr. Nader, a
lifelong consumer advocate, enjoyed high name recognition. But now,
more than a decade later, the Green Party has matured to the point at
which Ms. Stein’s lower profile may be balanced by a more savvy
political operation.

“The Green Party only needs to pull a very small number to provide an
upset in a state like Ohio, if the balloting is close,” said Peter
Ubertaccio, chairman of the department of political science and
international studies at Stonehill College, in Easton, Mass. “Then
suddenly their insignificant overall numbers become hugely significant
in deciding who gets the electoral votes in that state.”

It’s a danger to their natural allies, the Democrats, he said.

Ms. Stein, 62, a graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Medical
School, takes her ultra-long-shot odds in stride and is eager to
explain to anyone who will listen “how a nice doctor like me,” she
says, “got to be in a Godforsaken place like this.”

A general internist who grew impatient with the social and
environmental roots of disease, Ms. Stein said, “I’m now practicing
political medicine because politics is the mother of all illnesses.”

The Green Party’s supporters tend to be young, but the party is also
popular with liberals of all ages who are disenchanted with the Obama
administration.

Emily Winter, 24, is one such voter. “I voted for Obama because he
preached change, and he’s done impressive work in the area of women’s
rights, heath care and foreign policy,” said Ms. Winter, a Boston
University graduate student who approached Ms. Stein on a South End
street to ask for a photo. “But I feel like too many other policies are
stuck where they’ve been for years.”

Ms. Stein, ever polished in bright scarves and slim pantsuits, is quick
to point out that she is the only candidate who has experience debating
Mr. Romney, which she did in the 2002 Massachusetts governor’s race,
her first of four unsuccessful attempts at elected office.

What did she learn? “It’s easy to debate a robot,” she said of his
speaking style.

While Ms. Stein ultimately lost big, with only 3 percent of the vote, a
poll taken by a local television station immediately after one debate
showed that 32 percent of voting viewers said she had won the debate,
compared with 33 percent who gave it to Mr. Romney (he ultimately won
the race).

“Stein wouldn’t have struck you, if you were watching the debates, as a
caricature of a third-party candidate,” Professor Ubertaccio said. “She
was thoughtful and spoke about policy quite knowledgeably.”

Still, some detractors dismiss Ms. Stein as a perennial protest
candidate who has never gained much traction with voters.

Now a major challenge for Ms. Stein, a native of the Chicago area who
lives northwest of Boston with her husband, a surgeon (they have two
adult sons), is to show that she can win support around the country.
She longs to be included in the nationally televised debates, a high
hurdle for any third-party candidate. According to the Commission on
Presidential Debates, a candidate must have “a level of support of at
least 15 percent of the national electorate” as determined by five
national polling organizations.

Ms. Stein’s problem, then, is of the chicken-and-egg variety: to get
national name recognition, she needs television exposure in debates.
But she does not qualify for debates because of a lack of national name
recognition.

She thinks that is by design, to benefit major parties.

“If they actually have to debate a living, thinking, informed person,
it’s very hard for them,” Ms. Stein added, referring to Mr. Obama and
Mr. Romney. “They have kind of a mutual agreement, which you can see
evident in the nature of their debate right now. If it’s important,
they won’t go there. Many issues are not on the table.”

Ms. Stein says she emphasizes issues like ecological sustainability,
racial and gender equality, and economic justice. The centerpiece of
her platform is a Green New Deal, a twist on the Roosevelt-era programs
intended to stimulate job growth and the depressed economy. It could be
paid for by ending the presence of American troops in Iraq and
Afghanistan, the campaign says, and by eliminating waste in the health
care system. Beyond that, Ms. Stein favors a progressive income tax
that would raise rates on the wealthy.

“There are overwhelming benefits to moving to a green economy that
provides jobs and good wages,” she said.

Ms. Stein is quick to align Mr. Obama and Mr. Romney, saying their
policies are nearly indistinguishable. She cites the former governor’s
policy on health care and the president’s health overhaul as an
example. (She supports a single-payer system.)

“We need to have people in Washington who refuse to be bought by
lobbyist money and for whom change is not just a slogan,” Ms. Stein
said. “It seems like there’s a rebellion going on, and people are
really ready for something different.”

-- 30 -- 

Photo Captions:

Jill Stein, the Green Party’s expected candidate for president, picked
carrots with a flourish last week in Boston. She hopes to be the
party’s first candidate to qualify for federal matching funds.

Charlie Mahoney for The New York Times

Jill Stein talked with Glynn Lloyd about his farm in the Roxbury
section of Boston.



More information about the gpga-news mailing list